Home Blog Page 321

Apple Inc. (AAPL) New iPad Air Coming On October 21 !

1

Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is all set to launch new iPad Air on October 21 at an event, reported Daily Dot, citing the sources familiar with the development. Apple iPad would be reportedly unveiled in two variants along with the new version of its Mac operating system.

Earlier rumors also claimed that Apple will hold two separate events for iPhone and iPad launch this year. While Apple unveiled iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus along with Apple Watch in a recently held event on September 9, the company is gearing up for the next event to introduce the new lineup of iPad. According to the sources, Apple would introduce a sixth generation of iPad, purportedly known as iPad Air 2, and the third edition of iPad Mini at the event. Besides, Apple will also make a public launch of its new Mac operating system OS X Yosemite, which has gone through a complete visual and functional overhaul. The developer preview and the first beta version of the Mac operating system is already been released.

Apple ipad-air-2-launch

However, Apple’s spokeswomen declined to comment on the rumor.

The sixth generation of iPad would sport 9.7-inch Retina display while the new third edition of iPad will also have a 7.9-inch screen. Apple’s aggressive launch strategy is being seen as the preparation for the upcoming holiday season. Every year Apple sells record units of iPhone and iPad during the holiday season, making its first fiscal quarter the most profitable quarter of the year. In the last two quarters, Apple failed to meet market expectations; in the second calendar quarter of 2014 Apple sold 13.3 million units of iPad, failing to meet analysts’ projection for 14 million sales. Consequently, the year-over-year growth of Apple iPad declined by 9.3% during the second quarter of 2014, while the overall tablet industry recorded 11% growth during the same quarter.

Worldwide Tablet Market by Screen Size 2014 - 2018

Apple introduced iPad Mini first time in 2012 expecting to grab a sizable chunk of the growing small-screen tablet market. In 2013, tablets with screen size between 7 and 8 inch controlled 55% of total tablet market, while in 2014, it’s estimated to grab almost half of total tablet shipments. Unfortunately, the Apple iPad Mini is yet to meet the expectations as the sales of Apple iPad Mini is not helping much as the overall iPad sales has been declining for the last few quarters.

Rumors are also making the rounds that Apple may introduce a bigger screen iPad this time. Few earlier reports have claimed that Apple is testing five models of iPad sporting a 12.9-inch display. A few sources have claimed that Apple will also introduce fingerprint scanner, like in the iPhone, with the upcoming iPad for the first time.

Advertisement

Apple Inc. (AAPL) And Samsung To Control 45% Of Worldwide Smartphone Shipments In 2014 !

1

Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (KRX:005935) would continue to enjoy their dominance over the global smartphone industry with a combined market share of 45% in 2014. It’s estimated that the number of smartphone shipments in 2014 will reach 1.2 billion, an increase of 18% from the last year, according to the latest report from the research firm Juniper Research.

With businesses still underestimating the power that small screens have brought with them over the past years, for the one’s still finding themselves behind ramparts of the traditional PC content shouldn’t be surprised if they are virtually invisible from the consumer’s list. However committed the former may be to cater to the demands of the consumer, the ease of availability of searching the contents has been one of the top priorities amongst the buyers. At least that is what the shipping numbers of the smartphones suggest.

worldwide smartphone shipments 2014

Samsung and Apple tops the chart, Huawei continues to grow

Driven by large screen devices, low cost and aggressive price point offerings, the worldwide smartphone market touched another landmark with shipments of around one billion units in a record time period of one year in 2013. With a year-over-year change of around 67.5%, Huawei continue to emerge as a strong future rival to the likes of Samsung and Apple who have sustained the top notched positions with a staggering shipment figure of 313.9 million units and 153.4 million units respectively compared to 48.8 million units of Huawei last year. Selling low-end models in foreign land, flagship products like Ascend P7, Ascend Mate 2 in mainland China and backed by its growth in emerging markets like the Middle East, Africa etc., Huawei plans to spend more on awareness campaigns and marketing details targeting to become a top-tier player in the field of smartphones.

Small screen is the new rage

smartphones-vs-desktops

According to a report by Gartner, with the traditional PC (Desk based and Notebook) seeing a decline of 6.6% from 296 million units in 2013 to 276 million units in 2014, Utramobile and Tablets saw an upsurge in the worldwide shipment. However, major shift in the consumer preferences was observed with the increase in smartphone shipments. With Mobile phones recording a growth of 4.9% from 1.80 billion units in 2013 to 1.89 billion units in 2014 and an overwhelming figure of 38.6% rise in Tablets worldwide shipments from 195 million units in 2013 to 207 million in 2014 has shown how the customers are making room for anticipated launches in the late quarter of 2014.

IDC Research Manager Ramon Llamas opined about the massive potential audience for smartphones, 78.1% by 2018, suggesting that for businesses not delivering up to expectations may find themselves in a hitch.

Challenge to keep up with the expectations

Albeit the soaring of the worldwide shipment of these devices have helped vendors increase average selling prices (ASPs), the challenges are to go hand in hand. A clear trend of consumers waiting for new screens calling out for mobile content that will look good on them, to hit the market, garner popularity and suit reviews, they tend to grab hold of the product with the fall or holiday season. This has led the businesses to take a fresh perspective over the current and the future needs of the potential buyers. Availability of tablets on a lower price and shift in choices from hardware to software has witnessed consumer’s split preferences between basic tablets and premium ones with the sale of the later anticipated to decline faster as would have been expected few years back. With the increased penetration of smartphones into the mass, the prices are expected to dip in a progressive way eventually even lowering the marginsThe BYOD policy is gaining acceptance with individual looking for owned-devices. It is expected that it will increase to 72% in 2017 as compared to 65% in 2013 and so will the security concerns of the enterprises.

The new and rising vendors will be continue to proliferate

Although developed economies will definitely continue to be the dominating factor, the emerging ones are making sure to close the gap between mature and emerging markets by playing a vital role in the market shares. As Juniper Research noted, with low-cost economy smartphones from $75 to $150 and ultra-economy smartphones costing under $75 smaller smartphone vendors will become ambitious with time.

Apple and Samsung won’t have an easy road ahead

xiaomi-mi3-2

Though the Apple and Samsung continue to share lion’s share of shipments, they saw a fall in their shares. Dropping to 25.2 percent in the second quarter of 2014 from 32.6 percent in the same quarter a year ago, Samsung’s shared its fate of losing share in the market with Apple, whose share dropped to 11.9 percent from 13.4 percent during the same period. Vendors in emerging markets like Xiaomi, who have succeeded to woo the Indian and China market, will continue to rival these big giants, Juniper said. With a second-quarter market share rise to 5.1 % from 1.8 % in the same quarter last year, Xiaomi has stunned the market by showing itself in the list as a star performer with shipments surging to 15.1 million from 4.1 million becoming fifth largest smartphone maker. Apple and Samsung have a tough road to travel ahead.

Advertisement

26% Of TV Viewers Go Online To Watch Shows Using Various Mobile Devices [GMIC Series]

0

It’s not surprising that today’s generation on an average is spending five hours and 16 minutes in front of a screen, but the startling element involved with this fact is that this span of time is spent without even switching on the television sets. These statistics were deduced by eMarketer, a social media research and analysis firm some time back which pointed out the increased devotion of the folks to smartphones, laptops and tablets each day. Hence, these figures clearly illustrate that in recent times there has been a drastic change in the definition of what counts as TV-watching!

With the launch of plethora of new devices and platforms, people are now actually indulged in watching more television programs than they used to some years back. The main reason for this changing trend has been the availability of the traditional cable TV online on mobiles and tablets either for free or in lieu of some bucks. Furthermore, the emergence of new television-related applications and technologies like multiscreen viewing and social media interaction has completely changed the behavior towards television in today’s scenario.

But the rate of adoption of these newer modes of digital broadcasting has not been same for every segment of society as not everyone have been preferring OTT TV or an Internet Television and yet there exists a class of viewers who considers the old idiot box to be far better than other sources. According to a report published by Strategy analytics based on a survey of 6000 US and European viewers, the love of people for TV has not yet deteriorated but the ways in which they are consuming it has changed drastically in a variety of ways.

The various classes of TV viewers

The segment of traditional couch potatoes, which prefer the conventional mode of TV rather than the online/OTT services yet account for the biggest segment of TV viewers which is 33%, but there has been a significant downfall in their numbers when considering that this was the commonest mode of watching TV some years back. Along with this classic couched class, a related segment of TV viewers was also highlighted in the survey aliased as Couch Chatters who also like watching TV more on an average but are majorly involved in chatting with friends what’s there on TV. Rest this chunk of viewers are least engaged in any sort of emerging activity like social networking related to TV or watching it online, and they account for 12% of total viewers.

MultiScreen TV Viewership 2014

The second largest class identified was of TV OTTers, comprising of 26% of viewers who prefer going online to watch specific shows using the new devices like laptops, mobile or tablets rather than viewing them on the television, but this segment also avoids communication of these shows with friends or others like the couch potatoes. The remaining groups consisted of all multiscreeners which have been further subdivided into three more disparate groups – Moderate, Indifferent and Maniac multiscreeners. Moderate and Indifferent multiscreeners both account for 11% of total audience and engage in most online TV and social media behaviors around TV with the exception that moderates do not follow TV shows using Twitter whereas the Indifferents do so and the latter are more likely to use smartphones, tablets and PCs to watch TV content. The last segment and the smallest group is of the Maniac’s which account for 7% of viewers and they are most likely to use service provider like VOD and OTT, online TV or video services along with each Maniac claiming to follow TV shows using Twitter.

The television companies and advertisers missing on both couch segments while targeting Millennials

The television content firms and the advertisers which are targeting millenials for extending their realms to target groups who favor these emerging trends of viewing are being disguised by the segment of couch potatoes and couch chatters because a substantial 30% of these millennial constitute both these clusters. Hence the firms catering the social media platforms and online ad campaigns are surely missing these segments of viewers which primarily consist of the audience aged below 35.

On the whole, there has been a slight increase in the ratio of people favoring the emerging trends to the traditional viewing attributes in US and the European nations that is 11:9. These emergent traits which include the incorporation of the elements of the multiscreen or online viewing amalgamated with activities related to consumption and communication around television would definitely turn out to be the driving factors in shaping the future of television over the coming years.  

This post is a part of GMIC-Dazeinfo knowledge partnership series. Asia’ largest Mobile and Internet Conference GMIC will bring together mobile industry executives, experts, entrepreneurs and developers at Vivanta by Taj – Yeshwantpur in Bangalore on 26th Sepetember, 2014. The latest edition of GMIC Beijing in May attracted more than 20,000 attendees. In addition to Beijing and Bangalore, GMIC is also hosted in San Francisco and Tokyo. You can apply to grab free Silver passes by following this link

Advertisement

Smartwatches Will Comprise 40% of Wristworn Devices By 2016 !

0

After the recent unveil of Apple Watch, the smartwatch industry is poised for the phenomenal growth in 2015. As Apple Watch is scheduled to hit the market in early 2015, most of the leading smartphone manufacturers are also gearing up to foray into the market with Android powered smartwatch. This will lead a sizable number of users to smartwatches, and by 2016 nearly 40% of wristworn devices would be replaced with smartwatch, estimates research firm Gartner.

smartwatch growth 2014 2015

Nearly seven out of ten leading smartphone manufacturers have already entered into the wearable industry by launching either smart band or smartwatch. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (KRX:005930) is leading the industry with nearly 40% share of the market, while Moto 360 and LG G Watch R are ready to challenge its dominance. At 2015, the shipment of smartband is estimated to reach nearly 43.2 million units and Apple Watch would be reportedly grabbing the largest chunk of the pie. Though, Apple’s high-price strategy will limit the market share of Apple Watch, it would still be the most preferred smartwatch for iPhone 5, iPhone 5C, iPhone 5S, iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus owners. Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) has sold nearly 263 million units of these models altogether by the end of the third fiscal quarter of 2014. Till the launch of Apple Watch, Apple is estimated to sell another 80 million units of iPhone 6, making the tally reach to 340 million. If one-third of these users opt for Apple Watch during in the first quarter of the launch, Apple could easily close the quarter with sale of minimum 120 million units of Apple Watch.

“Apple introduced three smartwatch models that will sell at a wide price range, with the lowest starting at $349. As with the iPhone, Apple’s high-price strategy for the Watch will limit its market share; yet, with its attention to design and the user interface, we believe this product will attract many users.” Said Angela McIntyre, research director at Gartner.

Besides Samsung and Apple, Sony, LG, Motorola and HTC are eyeing on the fast growing wearable market. However, consumers are expected to show interest only from the second half of the 2015, when there would be enough of choices available, especially after the debut of local vendors.

In spite of the fact that there are number of manufacturers strategically snooping around wearable market, there would be enough of opportunity available for each vendor. Even if a smartphone user decides to ditch smartwatch, there are enough possibilities he may end up buying a low-price smart band as companies like Xiaomi and many local vendors are actively working on less than $50 smartbands.

But the smartwatch industry is also posing a big challenge for smartphone users. Most of the smartwatches available in the market hog up a battery of connected smartphone and reduce the standby time by 30% – 40%. Consequently, smartwatch users have to look out for an alternate source of power in every six to seven hours, which spoils the whole experience of using a smartwatch.

Besides, the price factor is another challenge for smartwatch manufacturers. Most of the smartphone users are looking further to own smartwatch costs below $150. In 2014, many of the smartwatches launched are either expensive enough or not capable to provide a rich experience of a real smartwatch to users. In 2015, smartwatch industry may witness a price war between Chinese vendors who are actively looking to penetrate the global market with low-price smartwatch and smart band by leveraging low cost supply-chain system in China. Companies like Xiaomi and Huawei have already launched their smart bands in the China and looking forward to introduce it to emerging markets in APAC region.

Advertisement

Apple Inc. (AAPL) iPhone 6 Would Be Revolutionary But Not Because Of Its Specifications !

22
Apple new iPhone 6

Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) has finally revealed not one, but two new iPhones in an event last week, both with larger screens compared to the iPhone 5S. The iPhone 6 and the iPhone 6 Plus feature 4.7-inch and 5.5-inch screens respectively, along with a faster dual-core A8 SoC (System on a Chip) and a 128GB storage variant. It also features an 8MP camera with OIS (Optical Image Stabilisation), phase-detection autofocus and NFC payments.

Apple Is Behind The Curve In Hardware Specifications

Although Apple was the first smartphone vendor to utilize new generation hardware such as multi-touch capacitive screen and accelerometer in its devices, they have kind of slowed down since the release of the iPhone 4. Just after the announcement, an image comparing the iPhone 6 with the 2 year older Nexus 4 from LG Electronics Inc. (KRX:066570) went viral on the Internet. The image mocked the iPhone fanatics by explaining how Apple was at least 2 years late in bringing a smartphone with a 4.7-inch HD screen, NFC payments and 3rd-party keyboards. All these features were already present in the LG Nexus 4 which was released 2 years ago.


Now, all these allegations about the iPhone may be true, especially about hardware specifications. For instance, 1080p screens have existed in the Android world since December 2012. Same goes with the OIS and phase detection autofocus in the camera. The Nokia Corp (NASDAQ:MSFTLumia 920 was the first smartphone to feature an optical image stabilisation while the Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (KRX:005930) Galaxy S5 was the first Android smartphone to feature the phase detection autofocus. The NFC was first introduced in Android smartphones starting with the Samsung Nexus S with Android 2.3 Gingerbread on-board.

Almost all the Android smartphone brands including Samsung, HTC Corp (TPE:2498), Sony Corporation (NYSE:SNE), OnePlus, Asus (TPE:2357), Meizu, and Oppo took a dig at Apple. Samsung claimed that it took Apple three years to imitate them with a big screen like the Galaxy Note line-up. HTC wittingly mocked Apple for bringing a bigger screen and an elegant design while Oppo said that it wasn’t impressed by the iPhone 6 Plus, as it isn’t as compact as the Find 7 in spite of both featuring a 5.5-inch screen. Here are some of the hardware features that were introduced in the iPhone, though they were present earlier in devices based on other platforms.

Features iOS Other Platforms
1080p Display Resolution September 2014 (Apple iPhone 6) December 2012 (HTC Butterfly)
Dual-Core Processor October 2011 (Apple iPhone 4S) January 2011 (LG Optimus 2X)
LP-DDR3 RAM September 2013 (Apple iPhone 5S) October 2012 (Samsung Nexus 10)
Phase Detection Autofocus September 2014 (Apple iPhone 6) February 2014 (Samsung Galaxy S5)
OIS September 2014 (Apple iPhone 6) September 2012 (Nokia Lumia 920)
Zero Shutter Lag October 2011 (Apple iPhone 4S) October 2011 (Samsung Galaxy Nexus)
Simultaneous Video/Image Capture September 2012 (Apple iPhone 5) October 2011 (Samsung Galaxy Nexus)
1080p Videos @ 60 FPS September 2014 (Apple iPhone 6) August 2013 (LG G2)
4K Videos Not Present Yet September 2013 (Samsung Galaxy Note 3)
LTE-A September 2014 (Apple iPhone 6) June 2013 (Samsung Galaxy S4)
Wi-Fi 802.11 ac September 2014 (Apple iPhone 6) February 2013 (LG G Pro & HTC One M7)
P2P File Transfer September 2013 (Apple iPhone 5S) Since Forever
Fingerprint Sensor September 2013 (Apple iPhone 5S) January 2011 (Motorola Atrix)
NFC September 2014 (Apple iPhone 6) February 2006 (Nokia 6131)
Contact-Less NFC Mobile Payment September 2014 (Apple iPhone 6) October 2011
Shatter Proof Display September 2014 (Apple iPhone 6) January 2013 (Sony Xperia Z)
Barometer September 2014 (Apple iPhone 6) October 2011 (Samsung Galaxy Nexus)

As you can see above in the comparison table, Apple was at least 6 months late in bringing new hardware technologies into their smartphones. But, a big question looms that is bringing new hardware the only biggest achievement?

Apple iPhone 6 Success: Thoughtful Execution, Not Specifications

There is no doubt that Apple has slowed down a bit in terms of introducing new hardware in its devices, but their forte has been execution since the start of the company. Meaningful and perfect execution of features have been in Apple’s DNA since their inception. During the introduction of the first iPhone, not only they used a multitouch capacitive screen for better touchscreen sensitivity and accuracy, they also designed the UI in such a way that the hardware was fully being utilized with features such as pinch-to-zoom and kinetic scrolling. These two features turned out to be so impressive that it changed the whole landscape of how touchscreen smartphones went on to evolve. Every smartphone platform which came into existence after the first iPhone used pinch-to-zoom and kinetic scrolling as the basic way to navigate around the UI. Similar was the case with the introduction of iTunes. The iTunes music management and music purchase service was introduced with the first iPod. It was with iTunes that consumers, for the first time, had an ability to purchase individual music tracks.

Barometer was first used in the Samsung Galaxy Nexus which was released around 2 years ago, but neither Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOGL) nor Samsung made any practical use of it. Apple has introduced it in the iPhone 6 and is planning to measure elevation data during jogs, running and cycling. All of this data, coupled with vital information from Apple Watch will be integrated and measured in HealthKit. All the major fitness measurement product manufacturers are expected to integrate all the captured data into HealthKit APIs. This can make the HealthKit a holy grail of fitness related information of a user.

Apple had already introduced the Passbook last year, which allowed users to store coupons, event tickets, boarding passes, loyalty cards and other generic cards. Now with the introduction of NFC and Touch ID fingerprint recognition in the iPhone 6 and the iPhone 6 Plus, Apple Pay might be a success. Apple has already tied up with VISA (NYSE:V), MasterCard (NYSE:MA) and American Express (NYSE:AXP) for Apple Pay. They have also tied up with major banks in the US and managed to attract a lot of big retail and food store chains to work with them. Even though Google introduced NFC based mobile payment solution with Google Wallet 2 years ago with the Samsung Nexus S, they failed. According to reports from Financial Times, Apple will receive 0.15 percent cut from all the purchases made through Apple Pay. If this turns out to be even half the success of what is being expected, it would be a huge earning source for Apple in the coming years.

Just like these few examples, even though Apple is slightly late in introducing new hardware and features, almost all the business steps taken by Apple are usually very thoughtful and turn out to be successful in the long run. Not only Apple works on the implementation of those features, Apple also make sure that users actually use those features in their daily lives right from the day their devices are available for purchase. Combine these things with a possible massive upgrade cycle for the iPhone 6 and record prebooking for 4 million units of iPhone 6, it looks like 2014 will be a very successful year for Apple.

Advertisement

The Growth Of Facebook Inc. (FB) In Emerging Markets Is Really Disappointing !

0

Due to accelerated social media adoption by internet users, many contemporaries, like Facebook Inc. (NASDAQ:FB), Twitter Inc. (NYSE:TWTR), in the arena are expanding their realms to different parts of the globe. In the last two to three years many social media sites have shifted their focus towards the emerging markets of APAC and Europe regions. Front runners like Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn remain successful to an extent in increasing their user base in developing countries, but the slow growth of ARPU (Average Revenue Per User) in these countries is still a matter of concern for online networking giants.

The social media titan, Facebook was pretty much admired and embraced by internet users of APAC regions. But, the revenue derived from these countries is much lesser compared to developed nations. Average revenue per user in the US and Canada has surged up to nearly $6.44 whereas in Asia it is barely above a dollar ($1.08)

Average Revenue Per User From Asia Is Barely 48% Of World Average

If we analyze Facebook’s user base growth from emerging Asia markets, Quarter over quarter growth has been quite decent. At the end of Q2, 2012 there were mere 255 million users networking via Facebook and in Q2, 2013 this number rose up to 339 million. Currently, the figure stands at 410 million, an increment of 20.9% compared to the same period last year.

In parallel to user base growth if we analyze revenue per user obtained from the region the figure recorded were quite disappointing. In the last four quarters, ARPU for Facebook from Asia is as follows – $0.81, $0.95, $0.93 and $1.08. Whereas, in developed states of the US and Canada, recorded figures were $4.85 (499%), $6.03 (535%), $5.85 (529%) and $6.44 (496%) in the same period as above.

facebook ARPU Q2 2014

Facebook is failing to translate its success story of spiking user growth into revenue dollars. Marketers from emerging markets are very well aware of Facebook’s potential in advertising arena, but very few of them opt for paid ad offerings. Nearly 9 out of 10 small-medium businesses plan to invest in social media marketing but major share of this investment goes into managing the Facebook page rather than subscription for networking giant’s paid products.

More than 30 million business pages battle amongst themselves to engage over 1.3 billion Facebook users. Facebook’s recent news feed revamp is one of the likely reasons for advertiser’s hindrance towards paid ads. Advertisers are concerned over the reach of their paid ads amidst the tough competition between news feed posts to climb to the top of the users main feed. Rise in price of paid products by over 123% in last 1 year has resulted in a great deal of repulsion towards blue giant’s paid offerings.

Is Facebook Blinded By Its Staggering Revenue Figures?

The social media titan has continuously broken all records of revenue figures by the stupendous year over year growth rate. Facebook had recorded revenue as high as $1.184 billion in Q2, 2012, this figure rose up to $1.813 billion in Q3 of 2012 (up by 53%) and in latest quarter (Q2, 2014) the overall revenue figure rested at staggering $2.91 billion (up by 60%). These numbers are nice to hear when looked from overall growth prospective but if we deep dive into the geographical regions from which Facebook is earning, the results obtained are not encouraging.

In Africa, the user tally recently crossed 100 million but in terms of monetization it is still not in the news as ARPU for the rest of the world (including Africa) is mere $0.86. In Europe ARPU was slightly higher than the world average ($2.24) at $2.84. Zuckerberg, who masterminded internet.org to bring the entire internet population to Facebook, has failed to convert the increasing user base to revenue dollars.

Facebook has brought in video ads and lot more initiatives to boost its revenue growth. It is not just battling Twitter or other social networking sites, but also YouTube, Media firms, messaging apps and lot more by innovating various products. Nevertheless, these efforts will make a very significant addition to its money bag, but in the long run, social media titan definitely needs to work out to drive even distribution of revenue across the globe.

All said and done, all the above statistics clearly highlights that Facebook is failing to bring in more paid customers. While US and Europe is stagnating for Facebook, ASIA and Africa remain the only bucket Facebook could look into for its future market penetration. However, the not-so-lucrative revenue growth of the these regions could make investors furious in the long run.

Advertisement

Facebook Inc. (FB) Attracts 10x Unique Visitors Than Twitter In India !

3

Facebook Inc. (NASDAQ:FB)  is facing a slowdown in India as the number of monthly unique visitors declined the first time, while the rest all major social networking sites registered a growth during the same period.

Among the top 20 nations of the world in terms of the Internet population, India has the lowest web penetration of about 19%, but talking in terms of yearly growth, it is the unrivalled king accounting for 14% growth in the last one year.  At present more than 250 million people are online in this nation of 1.2 billion folks which proportionate for 8.33% of the total Internet users’ in the world and hence making India an increasingly significant source of web traffic. The major contributors to this digital growth in India have been the social media platforms because a whopping 86% of Indian web users visit social networking sites and on an average spend 217 minutes daily on these networks. With no surprise, Facebook at the moment stands at the apex among the plethora of social networks prevalent in the nation and has inked India completely blue in the world map of social networks. According to a report published by eMarketer, approximately 58 million people from India visited Facebook in the month of March this year, which is almost 14 times the number of people who visited Twitter Inc. (NYSE:TWTR) in the same month.

Facebook in India alone has added 16 million users since January, 2014-that is roughly one new user every second and at present this social media giant harbour 108 million monthly active users in the country out of which 93 million visits the website through the mobile devices.  The realms of Facebook have not just been limited to the networking purpose, but it has also emerged as the most preferred avenue for checking out local enterprises and promulgating products.

facebook linkedin twitter visitors india social media

In the recent times, there has been a slight decline on Y-O-Y basis in the growth of Facebook’s unique visitors in India recording a fall of 2.7% from March 2013 to March 2014 while on the other hand, the unique visitors of Twitter rose from nearly 3.9 million in 2013 to 4.2 million in 2014 accounting for a Y-O-Y growth of 8.7%. The other leaders of this social media segment also recorded a positive growth in their Indian visitors with Pinterest climbing up from 1.5 million visitors to 2.1 million (+38.8% Y-O-Y) and Yahoo profile upsurging to 4.1 million from 1.9 million (+110.8% Y-O-Y). LinkedIn Corp (NYSE:LNKDin the list of Indian social platforms ranked second but did not witness a growth in its visitors with 11.1 million users and the most popular social giant of 1990’s-Orkut continued its trend of plummet (-71.8% Y-O-Y).

Though these numbers are almost six months old, due to the absence of any official figures of these social networks make this comparative analysis more valuable to understand the growth, presence and internet users’ engagement. Besides, the analysis also showcases the growing/declining monthly engagement of internet users in India on specified networks.

India has proved to be a promising market for the mobile messaging apps as well. Although these apps yet lag behind in terms of popularity in the country as compared to many other south Indian nations, their huge potential in the coming times to supersede the traditional social media platforms cannot be denied. Illustrating their impact; WhatsApp in 2014 accounted for more than 50 million users in India, which is 10% of its global user base. Other prominent international brands in this category like LINE and Viber are also bridging into the Indian markets along with domestic brands like Hike which in a span of just two years has acquired 15 million users although all of them are not from India.

The launch of Android One program by Google to acquire the large Indian mobile market with its cheap range of mobile phones is expected to benefit its frenemy Facebook also in the same ratio and hence can prove to be a driving factor in bringing back the positive growth of Facebook. Also, Facebook’s second quarter of 2014 accounted for more than 60% of revenues by mobile ads and Google’s earning was just limited to 12% by mobile ads in this quarter, but this disparity is expected to decline in the coming quarters with this new Android’s game changer in the Indian markets.

At present Internet accounts for 1.6% of GDP share of India yielding $30 billion, but this percentage is extremely poor as compared to other developing nations of the world. The dominant reason for this staggering is the country’s poor Internet infrastructure and according to the Q1 2014 State of internet report by Akamai Technologies, India continues to have the slowest average Internet speed among all the countries in the Asia Pacific region. The average Internet speed in India was deduced to be 1.7b Mbps in this quarter after an increase of 8.4% from the previous quarter and at the moment India stands at the 117 spot globally in the ranking of average broadband speed.  This has adversely affected the social media penetration in the country too and despite being Facebook’s second largest market globally, the social media penetralia in India remains at just 8%.

Advertisement

Market Share Of Phablet Devices Went Up By Five Folds Between 2013 And 2014

1

The large screen smartphone devices, widely known as phablet, have started penetrating into the global market thoroughly. The bigger screen size of the Smartphones was successful in luring the tech consumers towards it. However, till last year, the scenario was different; the phablet wasn’t so popular in the flourishing market of smartphones and tablets. Though, the newly arrived contestant could not beat the already established business of smartphone and tablets, but it left a significant impact on its consumers, developers and manufacturers.

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (KRX:005930) was the one who came up with the idea of producing a device that have the efficiency of small screen size Smartphone and comfort of the large screen size tablet; there the vision of phablet arises. It’s a blend of Smartphone and tablet; it comes under the evaluation of both. A recent study by opera media works revealed that phablet users are a separate group but with a distinctive behavior. Though the number of phablet users is comparatively low, but as the trend in its growth rate depict, it seems it holds a great opportunity in the near future.

According to the latest study from mobile analytic firms Flurry, Phablet devices are going to change the smartphone market dynamics in the next two to three years. Based upon the data collected from 59,240 devices, the study was conducted to comprehend the way phablet devices have turned out favorably in the mobile market, with size being a major factor in its success. The types of devices on which this study has been done are classified into four categories according to their sizes, starting from the smallest size of around 3.5 inches – like blackberry – to the largest size tablets of more than 8.5 inches – as that of iPads.

Small Phones: Screen Size 3.5″ or smaller

Medium Phones: Screen Size 3.5″ – 4.9″

Phablets: Screen Size 5″ – 6.9″

Small Tablets: Screen Size 7″ – 8.4″

Full-size Tablet: Screen Size 8.5″ or greater

After comparing the figures of 2013 Smartphone market to that of 2014, it seems like phablet devices are ready to change the market scenario.

Phablets Playing A Good Deal, Multiplying its App Share Activity

Phablets have admirably cut down the market share of medium sized phones by 2 percent point, full sized tablets by 2 percent point and small phones by 4 percent point which, as shown by data, are affected severely. The sheer decline in the market share of small phones clearly pictures the increasing desire for larger size phones. We can also see that the only unaffected genre of phones is the small size tablets which are more or less offer the same size as that of phablets. Hence there is almost no decline in market share of small sized tablets though phablet itself has witnessed a surprising five fold increase in its market share within one year, which is now a new subject under examination. Currently, except for phablets, no other smart device could gain as much a market share as that of it within 12 months, which actually is quite surprising.

In 2013, flurry reported that the total market share of phablet was just 2 percent, which gained a remarkable increase by getting it to the 10 percent market share. Probably that is the reason why smartphone OEMs are investing more on phablets.

flurry_device_type_blog_v1

As per the report, 6 percent of the total active mobile users are on the phablets today compared to 3 percent last year, but it is to be kept in mind that this increase of market share of phablet has come at the expense of small and medium sized smartphones. However, consumers are still continuing to find their satisfaction in small and full size tablets, the growth marked the gain of 2 percent point, as a result its market share increased from 5 percent to 7 percent by active users.

flurry_active_users_blog_v1

You may find it confusing to get the conclusion of the penetration of phablets in the market from the data provided. Studying app session can be a solution to this. They are indicators of actual device usage. It’s quite evident from the data that phablets command a disproportionate share of app activity, while they have only 6 percent active users, but control 11 percent of all app sessions, which was only 3 percent last year.

flurry_app_sessions_blog_v1

Since iOS has just introduced a new phablet device, iPhone 6 Plus, which is yet to reach to users and Windows Phone OS has got almost next to nil market presence, so we can get a better understanding of the penetration of phablets in the market just by studying trends in Android users.

The number of phablet users is quite unexpectedly large when it comes to Android users. Within a year the market share of active Android Pablet devices went up to 18 percent from 7 percent last year. Clearly a sign of significantly increasing demand for the larger phones.

flurry_android_blog_v1

We can also see that demand for both the types of tablets also grew from 10 percent to 12 percent within one year. However, almost 13 percent users withdrew from using mid size phone between 2013 and 2014, which witnessed a remarkable loss of medium phone market from 70 percent to 61 percent. Android users are moving towards the larger phones or tablets, and a better option than both of them is phablet, hence the demand for it is increasing.

Phablet to Books or Books to Phablet

Flurry also tried to find out the types of users who preferred phablets over any other device; they could get to the conclusion that there was no “killer category” that captivates phablet users. In fact, they are all like any other user of any of the smart devices, using it more for social media, gaming and entertainment apps, but the interesting thing that flurry noticed in this trend was that the books is the category in which phablet users over-index the most. The noticeable thing about this observation is that Phablets account 6 percent of the installed base, so the fact that phablet users account for 10 percent of the total time spent on books implies that phablet users are intend to invest more time in reading on a large screen.

flurry_books_blog_v1

Evidently, this shift from the small and medium phones to phablets, small and large tablets is among the readers. The sharp decline in the time spent on books by medium phone shows that how difficult it could have been to read content on the small screen, but when they have got the option they are ready to make that change despite the bulkiness of the large devices. What is more important for them is the ease with which they can read on larger devices, and moreover it is fun using a larger screen device in many ways.

Phablet users are more social influencer personas

According to the study of the outcome of the use of flurry personae as a proxy for behavioral makeup of phablet users, the outcomes of which were found to be more social influencer persona by 2.4 x 35% as compared to 15 percent mobile users across all devices while just 12 percent phablet users were entertainment enthusiasts compared to 6 percent of all mobile users. Business travelers and business professionals, both use phablets 1.5 times more than a average mobile user.

By comparing the sites and apps frequently visited by phablet users, they reflect themselves as extremely socially oriented. It is speculated that by 2016, 50 percent of the online video consumption will be done by mobiles and tablets will be the most popular device involved in it. Although the trends shown by phablet users is more or less similar to that of Smartphone users, since people prefer entertainment and social media over information and knowledge on a larger screen, the trends shown by them are quite different. Hence the users spending more time on social media, games and entertainment is not at all surprising.

Opera media works president Scott Swanson commented on these inferences “What we discovered is people now want to use their Phablets for both purposes — to run around town, use the map, check email, text a friend that you’re running late. Then they were also using it at home, sometimes instead of a tablet, for checking social media.”

Medium sized Smartphone still lead the race

Although the phablet market has significantly grown during this year but it still is not as fully fledged as Smartphone market is. In 2013, out of 980 million Smartphone shipments, only 20 million were phablets. According to Juniper research estimation, this number will grow to 120 million annually by 2018. And till then the total number of Phablets shipped will be 1 billion. Asia has a huge market for large screen devices, in March 2014, 40 percent of Chinese smartphone buyers preferred phablets over Phones.

Hence, in the future it is not certain which device will be the most used devices because each of them has their own unique purpose that cannot be met by any other device. So probably people will try to integrate all of them according to their requirements. However Smartphone still remains the most considerable device, because people do prefer easy to hold devices than the bulkier ones.

Bigger, the better

This notion of bigger the better rightly applies on the increasing usage of phablets. This is quite confirmed now that consumers are looking forward to own bigger screens. For the last few years tablets have been replacing TVs, magazines, PCs to a larger extent as the all in one way of source of information and media has been made easily accessible on it.

Apple in the field of Phablet market with all other rivals

Since all other rival companies have already launched their large screen devices in the market, which however are more successful in luring consumers, Apple has also plunged into the market with the recent introduction of the bigger screen iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus. However, with the premium price tag, it would be interesting to watch how phablet users react to Apple’s 5.5-inch iPhone 6 Plus phablet device. It has already been proved how larger screen devices have been successful in their growth within a short span of time. Samsung which comes out as a dominating company with shipment of 44 percent of all other devices having the maximum number of devices with bigger than 5-inche screen in the market. All other companies like LG, Sony, Huawei, have played their part of being in the race by developing phablet Smartphones as their high end products. Apple almost lost its second place in Chinese Smartphone market simply because it could not provide the competition to larger screen phablets.

Advertisement

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) Is Set To Dump “Windows Phone” !

3

As speculated by its recent ways of promoting and presenting their products, Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) is planning to dump its various numbering and naming series and replace it with plain-old windows. Don’t be surprised to find the upcoming Windows phones without “Windows Phone” but just with “Windows”, as one such product has already been launched in the market with this brand old name of ‘Windows’. Promoting it as ‘HTC One (M8) for Windows’ by omitting “Phone” is how it has come into existence. It seems that word “Windows Phone” is being eliminated to bring the mobile and desktop operating system under the same designation.

According to a report obtained by GeekOnGadgets, we’ll witness these changes soon, as initially only Nokia will be dropped from upcoming gadgets, leaving Lumia as the chief brand. The report also mentions about the last two handsets to feature Nokia are Lumia 830 and 730. However, “Microsoft” would be paired with “Lumia” in the future devices.

Microsoft Windows Phone Nokia Kill

In an internal document, obtained by GeedOnGadgets, Microsoft has confirmed that as part of their phased transition, the company will drop the manufacturer name (Nokia) from product references during the holiday campaign.

Can it be a strategy shift?

It is quite digestible to see the collapse of Nokia as Microsoft only acquired the business from the Finnish company, but moving away from Windows Phone can be seen as a strategy shift. The recent commercials for Lumia 930, don’t even mention Windows phone at all. HTC’s new M8 also takes the same procession. Hence it is not surprising to find out something you know is going to happen beforehand.

As Nokia Phone has significant distinction outside the US, it needs an umbrella brand for its phones, probably “Lumia” will meet out this demand. Besides, in last three years, Microsoft failed to gain a sizable share of global smartphone market. Though Windows Phone OS market share double in three years, the company closed the second quarter with a mere 2.5% share of the total smartphone market. Comparatively, arch-rivals Android has more than doubled its market share between Q2, 2011 and Q2, 2014.

However, another reason to dump the word Windows Phone might be the awkwardness of the set of words that was formed by conveying something like Windows phones running Windows Phone. Moreover, Microsoft is believed to be structuring a single version of Windows that will run on both ARM-based Windows Phones and ARM based Windows Tablets. Hence calling this operating system as “Windows Phone” would be puzzling.

Although calling it Windows would resolve this problem of confusion, but it isn’t clear that whether this version would allow to run existing Win32 apps because the other Threshold SKU for desktops or PCs are sure to allow these apps.

Therefore, we can see this as more of a strategy than an authentic declaration of information. Also predictably, it seems to be a way to market its products, advantageously.

This chaos of identification of operating system has also given rise to another question among masses; whether or not the upcoming Windows follow the hierarchy of its nomenclature. Whether, would it be called Windows 9 just as the follow up of Windows 7 was Windows 8? As with this proposal of Only-Windows, the tradition of naming will change.

But even after this, WindowsPhone.com, is still promoting Windows Phone on the US version of the site.

This obsession with “only Windows” had given rise to this Windows everywhere campaign, almost during mid-2013, which also did not talk about Windows Phone, RT, or 8.1. It was all Windows. As explained by Windows Watcher Mary Jo Foley that it was an explicit attempt to blur the boundaries between device types. “One experience. On every device. For everything in your life.” Was the campaign’s tag line.

Lately, in July, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said that windows would congregate and be one operating system that covers all screen sizes. It may be suggestive of the consolidation of the naming practice of Windows. But surely it doesn’t mean that Microsoft is going to produce an OS, which would run everywhere irrespective of its structural design.

However, it still isn’t certain what Microsoft’s branding strategies are unless we receive more Windows phones without the “Phone” fraction. Though we can get hints about the future plans of Microsoft with the launch of new OS or Threshold or Windows 9. A public preview of Windows 9 is expected to come by the end of September.

Advertisement

Apple Inc. (AAPL) Will Dominate SmartWatch Market In 2015, But Do Customers Really Want One?

7

Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) stunned the world once again on September 9 by launching its newest product, the Apple Watch. This is the Cupertino-based giant’s newest addition to its product line-up since 2009, when the first Apple iPad was announced. As expected, the Apple Watch boasted some interesting features such as the digital crown and various health and fitness monitoring capabilities. The arrival of the Apple in the wearable device shipments category has re-ignited the fledging smart-watch market, where shipments have already risen by 684% in the first half of 2014. The Apple watch is all set to hit retail stores worldwide starting from 2015, and is already expected to dominate the market.

apple_tim-cook-one-more-thing

Market Research Analyst firm Canalys has predicted that Apple will effectively dominate the smart-watch market in 2015. However, it would be smart bands that would lead the wearable market, atleast for next two years. Shipments of wearable band will grow 129% Y-O-Y, to sell a total of 43.2 million units in 2015. Of these, 28.2 million sold will be smart-bands, while 15 million units will be basic bands.  Currently, the leaders in this segment are Samsung Electronics Co Ltd. (KRX:005930) , Jawbone and a host of other players  such as Motorola, LG Electronics Inc. (KRX:066570) and Sony Corp (ADR) (NYSE:SNE).

Why Would Customers Want  A Smart Band?

The new range of smart-watch devices have been greeted with much skepticism by consumers. Several vendors have offered no solid reason why a customer would ever need one. Although wearable technology such as Google Glass, fitness bands, and health monitors already exist,  these are still early days for wearable technology as no one has figured out what they are truly meant for.

worldwide smart band shipments forecasts 2014 2015

Sensing the mood, Apple has tried to spark interest through health, fitness, navigation applications as well as workout, activity tracking and mobile payments. But the company is intelligently trying to satisfy two markets by loading features of a smart band and smart watch in one device, Apple Watch. The other players in the market, meanwhile, such as Xiaomi have already unleashed a price war by launching basic bands such as the Mi band at a jaw dropping price of US $13. Google too, has pitched Android Wear as a practical ecosystem to compete with Apple Watch. The long term vision of all these device makers will be to extend the capabilities of smartphones, and offer clear value to customers who will be looking to prove the purchase of yet another connected product.

Apple Smart-Watch Expected To Dominate Market Next Year

Apple’s arrival in this field is extremely significant for good reasons. After pioneering the MP3 player, smartphone and tablet devices, there is immense pressure on the company to repeat the same with smart-watches. With a high price tag of US$349, the device will appeal to initial consumers with plenty of disposable income. Just as with smartphones and tablets, this will create an opening where cheaper and better products will soon enter the market, thus turning smart-watches into everyday mainstream products. Canalys analyst Daniel Matte explained the reason why is Apple’s smart-watch the clear winner among all other brands.

‘By creating a new user interface tailored to its tiny display, Apple has a produced a smart watch that mass-market consumers will actually want to wear. The sleek software, variety of designs and reasonable entry price make for a compelling new product. Apple must still prove, however, that the product will deliver adequate battery life for consumers.”

Disruptions Will Affect Apple’s Performance Quickly

Apple may have the upper hand initially, but just as with smartphones and tablets the market is prone to several disruptions. As Apple is trying to satisfy two different breeds of hand-wearable device – Smart band and Smart Watch – Fitbit and Jawbone will have the advantage of low-priced products in the near-future, but competition is sure to escalate. This will in turn push the prices of smart-bands even further down, and match the prices of basic bands. With the market poised to grow to 373 million units by 2020, this is a segment with enormous opportunity. The current trends bear characteristics similar to the feature phone market, which was several disrupted when smartphones began to appear.

apple-watch

Apple still has plenty of opportunities ahead in the coming months with the release of the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 plus. Million of units of both devices are expected to be shipped worldwide and trigger Apple’s biggest iPhone upgrade cycle. If the Apple Watch can match the iPhone’s success, the company will have transformed the world once again.  For now, though, Apple’s Watch has been criticized for being overpriced and under-innovative, but it has undoubtedly re-ignited interest in a device that has long been considered obsolete. However, it would be also interesting to see how Apple could kill two birds with one stone!

Advertisement

Asia’s Largest Mobile Conference GMIC Coming To India: Grab The Passes [EXCLUSIVE]

2

Global Mobile Internet Conference (GMIC) – Asia’s largest mobile industry gathering is making a foray into India with GMIC Bangalore on September 26th, 2014.

India, the fastest growing mobile and internet markets worldwide, holds immense opportunity for all tech professionals and aspiring entrepreneurs. A country with nearly 1.23 billion people, out of which 252 million internet and 111 million smartphone users pose a huge window of opportunity with massive growth possibility by 2017. It’s a time when you look beyond horizon and understand how leading companies, startups and successful executives have thrived by encashing current market dynamics.

GMIC Bangalore 2014

With the theme of “The Next Wave of Mobile”, GMIC Bangalore will explore the current and emerging trends, technologies and business models in India’s burgeoning mobile internet industry. The smartphone market in India is the 3rd largest in the world and is slated to exceed the size of the U.S. market by the end of this year.

GMIC Bangalore will bring together mobile industry executives, experts, entrepreneurs and developers at Vivanta by Taj – Yeshwantpur in Bangalore. The latest edition of GMIC Beijing in May attracted more than 20,000 attendees. In addition to Beijing and Bangalore, GMIC is also hosted in San Francisco and Tokyo.

GMIC is organized by GWC, a membership organization which serves as a platform for mobile industry executives to build connections and trust with other mobile industry leaders across the globe.

Confirmed speakers include:

  • Sachin Bansal, CEO, Flipkart
  • Naveen Tewari, CEO, InMobi
  • Hugo Barra, International VP, Xiao mi
  • Vikram Chandra, CEO, NDTV
  • Rajesh Magow, Co-Founder, Ceo India, Make my trip
  • Neeraj Roy, CEO Hungama
  • Kunal Bahl, CEO, Snapdeal
  • Bhavish Aggarwal Co-Founder & CEO at Olacabs.com
  • Mark Patricof Managing Partner at MESA Global
  • Yu Yongfu, CEO, UCWeb
  • Kavin Mittal Bharti CEO, Hike
  • Nathan Eagle , CEO and Founder, Jana mobile
  • Vishal Gondal, Founder/CEO Goqii
  • Dippak Khurana, CEO, Vserv
  • Karan Mohla, Vice President, IDG Ventures India
  • Vijay Shekhar Sharma, CEO,Paytm
  • Sasha Mirchandani, Founder/Chairman Kae capital, Co-founder Mumbai Angels
  • Alex Qian, Managing Director, Chang You
  • Gerri Kodres, SVP , Furtumo
  • Nitish Mittersian, CEO, Nazara Games

GMIC Bangalore will include an expo which will showcase products and services from mobile companies and startups. As part of GMIC Bangalore, GWC is also organizing G-Trip, an executive trip for mobile industry leaders who will visit Indian mobile and IT companies.

Free Passes For Dazeinfo Readers

Readers of Dazeinfo – exclusive Knowledge Partner of GMIC Bangalore – can avail a 20% discount on GMIC Gold passes by using the code GMIC-DIG to register here. If you are one of the esteemed readers of Dazeinfo or a tech geek willing to attend the GMIC event, we are offering startups and developers complimentary 250 silver passes, valued of $200 each. Just fill up the form and you could one of those 250 lucky mascots who would grab a free pass.

Advertisement

Facebook Inc. (FB) Dominates 130 Countries: World Map of Social Networks

4

Sometimes back we had analyzed the December 2013 world map of social networks which deduced Facebook Inc. (NASDAQ:FBas the czar of social media sites and now in the recent update of this demographic plot of nations by Vincos, it reveals that this online social media titan is continuously expanding its realms all round the globe. The dominance of Facebook has been so emphatic that with every update of this social world map, more and more territories are getting painted in blue.

The July 2014 edition of World Map of Social Networks unveiled the extinction of one more social player Draugieum whose region of operation was overtaken by the blue giant and now the monthly user base of Facebook stands at a whopping 1,317 million spanning across 130 nations worldwide out of the 137 countries analyzed. The growth in the number of MAUs of this social network has not been very terrific in the past 8 months with an increase of about 110 million, but it has been able to conquer two major territories of Europe – Moldova and Latvia dethroning Odnoklassniki and Draugieum respectively which has now made this Zuckerberg’s inception the unrivalled king of Europe. Furthermore, with this succession in Europe, Facebook also has created a bridge to the Russian nations, where the local networks still have an upper edge. Currently, this social network leader has 410 million active users in Asia (+42 million since last December), 292 million in Europe, 204 million in USA & Canada, 362 million in other countries. VincosWorldMapOfSocialNetworksJuly2014650 The increased rate of adoption of Facebook all across the world can be attributed to its expanding domains wherein it is now not just limited as a mode of connection and communication, but has also emerged as the preferred avenue for checking out local enterprises, promulgating products and provision of API’s. Also, the 1.07 billion mobile MAU base has been a prime driver in the success ride of this online networking giant. According to Facebook’s Q2 results of 2014, the company’s revenue reached to $2.91 billion recording an increase of 67% from the same quarter last year and the major contributor to this growth was the mobile advertising revenue which represented almost 62% of advertising income of this quarter. The combined effect of all these factors have really led Facebook’s stock to bounce back strongly after the negative response of its IPO and the company share recorded a massive 74.9% of growth in last one year.

Other insights from the social map

One of the major differences observed since last December in the global social scenario was in Iran, where even though the strong state censorship towards western social media is prevalent, there was a change of habits with Facenama taking the place of Cloob. Also in 2012, the local social networking players of Russia- V Kontakte and Odnoklassniki – outplayed the competitors with a user base of 228 million and 148 million, respectively, but in the recent revelations to data traffic by Alexa, they have fallen weak in front of Facebook and are struggling to conquer the market. Talking about the social stats of the Asian continent, China Qzone yet dominates the rest with 645 million users followed by Sina Weibo with 503 million registered users (not active users).

wmsn_animated_jul14_690-2

The social fever among the folks has also lead to flourishing of Instant messaging apps. The leader of this segment QQ International presently accounts for 829 million monthly active users (+1% YoY), followed by Whatsapp – the new $19 billion acquisition of Facebook harboring 600 million active monthly users(+50% YoY) – and next in line is WeChat with 438 million active users (+57% YoY).

The easy-to-use interface of Facebook along with innumerable features has made Facebook the hot favorite social platform among the world population. Along with this, the colossal user base of this social network giant makes it the most preferred medium among the mob to get connected to any corner of the world. Although with the emergence of newer social platforms like Snapchat and LinkedIn, the social consumption of Facebook has declined, but with the talent acquisitions of 50 other companies till now, including Instagram and Friend.ly by Zuckerberg, at the present moment it seems a distant dream for any other social networking competitor to change this fast diffusing blue colour from the world map of social networks.    

Advertisement

Online Browsing Superseding Buying in Asia-Pacific In Comparison To Latin America!

0

With the internet user base reaching the third billion mark by the end by of 2014, more and more marketers are now clasping this lucrative platform to endorse their products, which in turn has proved to be the driving factor for the growth of e-commerce industry across the globe.  The trade analysts have forecasted the  Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of the global E-commerce platform to be 13.54 percent over the years 2013-2018, which depicts the strong hankering of the world population to shop on the WWW consortium. Although there has been a substantial increase in the range of products available online, for example Amazon claiming to offer one to all products from A to Z, yet for certain categories the conventional stores dominate the web cart.

According to a survey conducted by the Nielsen global on e-commerce, there exists a considerable disparity among the demand for the products available online and out of which the non-consumable durable and entertainment related products turned out to be the leader of the league. The survey outlined that the ratio of browsing to buying for such products like clothes, books and toys, booking hotels and flight tickets was almost one to one as compared to the consumable goods like the groceries, personal care products, alcoholic drinks etc. for which the same ratio came out  to be 1:1.5 approximately. However, the domain of the latter mentioned consumable goods is yet termed to be fledgling in the online sector but the strong co-relation between the browse-to-buy ratios in the survey depicted the increasing trust of buyers on even consumable goods on this dais. Apart from these strong browse-to-buy correlating rate goods, some categories of products carrying a high price tag or requiring physical try out in the list of surveyed products like the sporting goods, electronic gadgets; computer related goods also accounted for creating more browsing sessions than the buying deals and the browse-to-buy difference for these products averaged about seven percent. Airline Tickets and Reservations was the only category in which the buying rates superseded the browsing rates.

In the next six months, online shoppers globally are intended to buy non-consumable product and travel tickets more than those of products from other categories. Nearly half of these shoppers are supposed to buy clothes or make an airline or hotel reservation. On the other hand, in spite of aggressive marketing groceries stores and consumable products are yet to find a sizable market online.

e-commerce-report

The Bridging Regions Of Browsers And Buyers

The developing nations of the world like China, India, Brazil and Japan are the greatest contributors of online search and browsing in the world and hence boast of providing a huge audience for e-commerce too, but there is a big demarcation line in the trend of online browsing between the two regions of Asia-Pacific and Latin-America. The survey deduced that although the online browsing sessions were highest for the Latin American region, but these nations were the staggers in terms of purchasing goods in almost every category of goods analysed. In contrast, the Asia Pacific region outperformed the former in terms of buying power with almost 14 out of 22 product categories under the survey consideration exceeding the buying rates than the browsing rates. The reason for the same can be  attributed to the lack of availability of proper retail network and infrastructure in the Latin America hence limiting the realms of the e-commerce market. On the other hand Asia has proved to be the king in growth of online shopping and in 2014, 36.5% of worldwide B2C e-commerce sales is expected to be gleaned from the Asia-pacific region.

ecommerce-wire-2-emerging-markets

Another important factor which determines the elasticity of online shopping is the age of the consumers. The most preferred platform for the promoters are the social media networks and with more than 60% of its user base comprising of the Millennials (aged 21-34), this newer age group also dominates the e-commerce industry. This younger lot proportioned to 53% for buying a product online but the older generation was also not too far in this context and occupied a 40% share in the same segment.

Also with the increased number of online users logging through mobiles and tablets (about 25% of total user base), the marketers have tried to focus on the mobile shopping apps even to grab this large chunk of shoppers. In Asia-Pacific region 52% of the online shoppers preferred mobile for purchasing and in Latin America 48% of them intended for the same.

The sale of electronic commodities and entertainment categories have multiplied in recent times on the Internet, but the consumable goods on the web are also quickly gaining momentum like the baby products and fashion accessories. In a broader sense, the online transactions turn out to be handy for proliferating the shopping of non consumable goods, but when it comes to attract customers on grounds of consumable goods then it requires great marketing muscle. Hence maintaining a balance between the needs of the consumers for variety and value, whilst overcoming the negative perceptions like cost and shipping charges is essential for the enhanced and extended growth of the online shopping segment.

Advertisement

Only 33% Smartphone Buyers Are Recomended Apple Inc. (AAPL) iPhone, Samsung Most Favorite !

1

Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) iPhone failed measurable against Samsung smartphones when it comes to recomemndation. Nearly 63% of smartphone buyers, who bought a smartphone in the first quarter of 2014, were recommended Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (KRX:005930), while less than half voted in the favor of the Apple iPhone.

With the increase in the market of smartphones worldwide, a necessity to study the trends of the consumer attraction towards a product is vital to expand the market of a particular smartphone firm. Number of physical retail outlets alone cannot lure consumers into buying the product, there is a need to know what the customer wants from the product he is buying and what he does not, what makes him to go for a new brand ditching existing ones. He would never like to spend that sum of money onto the product which is not worth it.

Kantar Worldpanel’s ComTech’s has recently launched a retail module, across nine countries, which provides information on the key factor of the smartphone purchasing process that influences the consumer. Though this report exclusively focuses on the findings of the US smartphone market, but potentially it can give some idea for the worldwide consumers as well.

Key steps involved in the purchase of Smartphones

The growing market competition has increased the worries of smartphone companies. At a side when Average Selling Price (ASP) is declining with each passing quarter, the emergence of local players in developing market making the competition is just adding up the heat. However, this competition has resulted into a high maturity level amongst smartphone vendors, which in turn has resulted in the growing competition that has created a vicious circle of efficiency and competition.

It was found out that out of the total mobile phones sold in the US during the first quarter of 2014 , 76 percent were smartphones, and the penetration of these still continued to stand at 55 percent.

The noticeable and vital things for the firms to know was that, however aware and familiar their consumers are, they necessarily research before spending money in buying the smartphones. About 70 percent of the total people who conducted research prior to buying, were those who sought the advice and recommendation of people, and mostly relied on them. This major group of people are the ones which influence the market share of the companies. So the main focus of smartphone vendors should be to convince these influencers in order to play good in the market.

smartphone buyers research beofre making a purchase

About one fifth of the people relied on the advice of the store sell assistant and about a quarter of them sought advice from friends.

The fact that most of the electronics’ showrooms are more of advising stores than selling stores, but this concern was unfounded by smartphones (according to ComTech data) as the report showed that about 64 percent purchases in the US are made from these showrooms while only 24 percent purchases were done online. This shows that people are more reliable on showrooms and mobile stores (as for being on the safer side) which is not the same with online smartphone shopping. The reason might be the trust on these authorized company showrooms that would at the best avoid counterfeiting.

Ad about smartphone is also one of the major factors that affect the pre purchase research. The more influential and clear details are about the device, more people will get to know what they want according to their requirement, hence reduce their efforts of research. Apple product ads, for example, focus on specific features of the device such as camera, screen and its other applications, which results in a higher consumer call as compared to other brands.

According to the report, Samsung is rated as the most recommended smartphone in the US. It is estimated that 63 percent of the people who bought smartphones were recommended Samsung which is more than double the recommendation for Apple and ten times that of Nokia. Out of which only 59 percent consumers actually bought Samsung smartphones while the rest went ahead with other Android devices. Also, only 6 percent of the consumers who were recommended Samsung preferred iPhone over it.

In Store Brand Recommendation

This data clearly indicates towards the popularity of Samsung against all other rivals. Although people now-a-days prefer Samsung because of more – if not better – features at a cheaper price than offered by Apple. They find this offer more profitable and pocket friendly, however the reliability on iPhone for everything is still unbeatable, keeping the monetary terms aside.

Functionality vs. physicality

Though changes in consumers’ demands have been witnessed as they have shifted more towards preferring functionality over physicality. The scree-size and mega-pixel race that had started a few years back seems to have settled down a bit. Yet the number is still not ignorable, if not most important, as 42 percent consumers mentioned screen size as the main factor that influences their buying decision, while only 30 percent mentioned about screen resolution and quality. So it is considerable that screen size, when talking about design, is still the most important drivers of consumers.

With the apparent standardization of the design there are some signs of decline in preference for particular hardware design over functionality. However the demand for a particular design is not so less to be ignored. For the vendors that focus more on the sharpness and clarity of the display, it becomes difficult to convey their message during advertising or sale process in the store as even now, what according to data, it is concluded that “bigger is better for most consumers”.

Color, another important part of the design of the smartphones, though not at very high priority, has driven many companies to focus on it. Nokia with its new Lumia series and the recent X series has brought back color in the play. Other companies like Sony, HTC, Samsung and Apple have also shifted their slight focus on the color, though very conservatively. However, it is clear from the survey that color is yet not a deciding factor. Battery life and money are yet another more important deciding factors to win the cat race of being bestselling smartphone.

Advertisement

Amazon (AMZN) Fire Phone Flops, Even By Its Gimmicky Strategies !

0

It’s been just a few months since the launch of this dynamic, different, innovative-new generation smartphone by Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) and it has already struggled to sell quite a few number of Fire Phone units. Despite much anticipation and excitement for its plenty first seen and ostentatious features, it could not really satisfy people as it was incapable to solve practical purposes from it, which, for people, is the first and foremost requirement to be met with.

The nova of this Fire Phone, mainly coming from its glitzy features like 3D imagery, Dynamic perspective that provides information simply by moving the phone, unlimited cloud storage, may day help that gives the provision of Amazon’s live technical support round the clock, 4.7 inch display, a quad-core snapdragon 800 processor, 13 MP camera and pretty nifty and impressive hardware.

Jeff Bezos Launching Amazon Fire Phone

According to the research conducted by ComScore, Chitika and the Guardian, even such attractive offers could not lure much of the sales, which till now has reached not more than 35,000 units. However, getting a smartphone and that too Amazon Fire Phone for just $99 in a market which is also offering expensive-to-buy phones like iPhone 5 and Samsung Galaxy S5, is a no bad deal. Primarily, having an Amazon fire phone is a fun using it.

How Amazing is Amazon Fire Phone

Before, we hit out Fire Phone failure for all wrong reason, lets touch base few of the most innovative and impressive features of the phone that makes it stand out in an already crowded smartphone market.

The two key attractive and interesting features of this phone are its dynamic perspective and firefly. The former allows the phone to react to how you hold, view and move it and whereas the latter scans objects to provide you the information about them.

The other very considerable reason to buy this phone can be its attractive screen, which comes with 19 different interactive options that can really be amazing and cool to work with. However, this dynamic perspective of the phone’s screen is mostly useful only while navigating the phone’s interface and in games, for nobody really bothers how the lock screen of their phone looks like.

The noticeable part of the phone is its, 4.7-inch screen which is exactly the size of Apple’ just launched iPhone 6. Its HD 1280 x 720px resolution adds more to its fineness.

What people found unsatisfactory about its screen was it size, they wished it could be larger like phablet or Samsung Note 2, so that they could enjoy seeing videos on a larger screen.

The camera, however, is an advantage for Fire Phone.  It comes with a lots of fun editing tools like whitening your teeth or removal of red eye, like reducing blemishes just by few swipes or trying on with different contrasts and saturation effects. Its magnetic headphones are also one of the amazing part of this dynamic design.

Its integration with Amazon prime service may slightly encourage consumers to spend more money by making seamless purchases, which is just another strategy of amazon to expand its business by restricting you to its world of shopping. Also, because it can allow you to compare the prices of real-world objects to what Amazon have for sale, the feature is a showrooming nightmare.

Amazon has also announced a list for its upcoming apps and released two new games from its own Amazon game studio. Although promises have been made for more apps, but that seems a conceited topic because there’s no point for app developers to make apps for a relatively new smartphone with almost zero percent market share, when they have more lofty brands and platforms like Apple iOS and Google Android to work for.

Moreover the phone itself takes advantage of its dynamic perspective for fun; it seems that every app icon on the phone screen has depth when it is tilted. You can visit 3D-like landmarks through maps. Though none of these features could entice enough consumers, but the work done upon them shows how subtly they have focused on these details.

And then there is mayday, which lets you have a live video chat with an Amazon representative who will even demonstrate on the screen what you are supposed to do when you have any trouble with the phone. However, with too much of easy features to work with, it wouldn’t be difficult to operate such phone and need a mayday representative.

Fall of the Epic Phone

The main problem with the phone is that you cannot download all those necessary famous apps that you would wish to, which includes a list of such basic apps which you would never like to miss in your smartphone, like there is no Snapchat, Venmo,  Secret, LinkedIn, Gmail, Google maps, available on Amazon Fire yet. It might even frustrate you a bit.

In order to promote its online retailer, the Phone has all its features, camera and even the operating system built around its online shopping services that particularly aims at gaining retail from it by getting you buy more from its shopping store. Firefly is completely dedicated for this sole purpose to enhance the extravagancy of their consumers. It can allow you to search and buy from Amazon’s store, anything you see around yourself just by clicking a picture of it. Moreover, to ensure its accessibility, the phone has one dedicated button for this enticing feature.

Another issue with this phone is regarding its app store that binds you to itself once you buy this Fire phone. It means there is no provision of Google apps like Gmail and Drive on Amazon app store, knowing how vital they are now-a-days for people. Although, Fire Phone runs a forked version of Android operating system, it does not resemble Android at all.

The disappointing sales performance of the Fire phone can be attributed to its high price and exclusiveness. You won’t buy a phone with an operating system you are not accustomed to, at such a price, in such a market, where you can buy a phone-already famous and reliable and used to, spending the same sum of money if not less. The fire phone was launched for $199.99 for the 32 GB version and $299.99 for 64 GB version, with a contract of two years. It puts itself into the direct competition with iPhone 5S and Samsung Galaxy S5.

Fire Phone reminiscent of the ‘Facebook Phone’

The HTC backed up on Facebook Phone that was built around Facebook. The phone also carried the handsome amount of Price tag with it, but as in the case of Fire Phone, the Facebook Phone flopped as soon as it was launched last year. However, the Fire Phone proposed a better deal at least in terms of hardware if not the operating system. Hence it may be speculated that the phone might get a boost at some point of time and does not follow the fate of Facebook Phone.

How far can we call it a Failure?

Estimating a company to flourish in a saturated market, however, is a very difficult task. You never know how far this estimation of failure can go. Sometimes just a brand name works out, sometimes the efficiency of your device, the way you publicize and advertise, sometimes the time itself. For once specialised mobile phone companies, like of Nokia, can also face a grand failure just because of the introduction of more technologically advanced smartphones at a cheaper price than it. Even Facebook and Microsoft could not withstand the stiff competition of the market.

Amazon is already facing losses and falling short of wallstreet’s earnings expectations. Last month, it was reported by Amazon its largest quarterly loss since 2012 as operating expenses rose 24 percent, led by a 40 percent surge in spending on technology and content. It is also possible that this failed device gives Amazon a further blow. However, we may expect from Amazon Fire Phone to further acknowledge and revisit its marketing strategies and the features in the phone, in order to gain a place in the smartphone market.

Advertisement