Apple iPad Trademark Battle: Why Proview Is So Adamant ?

Must Read

Free Netflix in India: A Result of Slow Growth In Q3 2020?

Netflix is testing a new strategy that could lead to free Netflix in India. The online streaming...

Tesla First Cancels Return Policy And Now Cuts Warranty Period

Just last week Elon Musk surprised everyone by cutting the price of Tesla Model S twice in...

Jio Pages: The Indian Browser Reliance Is Betting On Now!

Looks like Reliance wants to establish Jio as a synonym of technology. After launching a fleet of...

Apple has been much in the news this New Year for the trademark related some sales related issues as that seen in China this year in the month of January. It opened online booking in China to overcome the same issue that took place. Recently Apple succeeded to win over Cisco for iPhone trademark but its problem doesn’t seem to come to an end as a fresh facing issue from the Taiwan’s company-Proview- for the iPad trademark, is again on the platter.

The situation depicts that Proview Technology could win somewhere from $38 million to $1.6 billion and also an apology from Apple, which is using the trademark in its Tablet lineups. Proview International registered the trademark name “iPad” in China and Taiwan in 2000 and 2001 respectively. Apple succeeded to buy “iPad” trademark for $55,000 in 2009 by the support of the company “IP Application Development”—but the deal was validated only for Taiwan.

“Apple obtained the iPad trademark by defrauding Proview Taiwan through tactics that involved explicit misrepresentations, and the use of foreign entities specifically created to perpetrate the fraud,” said Proview Taiwan spokesperson Cal Kenney, in a statement. “Proview Taiwan seeks the truth about who at Apple orchestrated the fraud, and the specifics of how it was implemented. Proview Taiwan believes that when the truth is exposed, the full weight of Apple’s fraudulent and nefarious behavior will be revealed and the appropriate remedies will be obtained.”

The use of trademark by Apple has damaged Proview’s market in China and in the US. In October 2010 Proview  threatened Apple not to use its trademark, if not it would take legal action against the company.  The report said that Proview registered the trademark “iPad” in several countries such as China, South Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, Mexico, and EU. After long pursuance, Proview finally sued Apple in 2011, in retaliation for the same. Apple also counter-suited its own contention. Apple said that Cupertino, California based company was genuine owner of iPad trademark and the use of the trademark is quite ethic for the company. However, Apple failed to win the case against Proview.

Advertisements

In January 2010 Proview came back to Apple stating that two of the trademarks covering mainland China included in the original deal were actually owned by Proview Shenzhen and the price for those two trademarks will now be $10 million. The company has indicated it is willing to come to a settlement with Apple over the issue though the company has not indicated the amount it is seeking for the settlement.

Proview has filed separate lawsuits in local courts in two Chinese cities—Shenzhen and Huizhou– to withhold the selling and marketing of Apple’s iPad in the country. It’s a belief that Apple will lose its appeal in China where more than 122 million people still do not own a Smartphone, so the rate of penetration is expected to be high.

With the release of the iPad 3 to be in a few days from now, the trademark issue might prove to be a hindrance to the company and prove to be a problem for the company to reach the expected sales. The “iPad” which helped the company secure 26% of the mobile market the previous quarter, might no longer have the name which we know it by and might jeopardize the company’s upcoming Tablet’s sales as well.

Via: digitaltrends

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest News

Google Boots Out 3 Immensely Popular Android Apps from Play Store: Questions About Content Policing Resurface

With such a flourishing wilderness of Android apps on the Google Play Store, there is every likelihood...

Reliance Future Group Deal In The Soup: SIAC Orders To Put The Deal On Hold

When Reliance agreed to acquire Future Group for $3.4 billion, recently, the share of Reliance Industries Limited rallied on the stock market....

Can Facebook Be Trusted For Newly Announced Hosting and Shopping Services?

Every coin has two sides. For Facebook Inc. (NASDAQ:FB), the positive side says that it has launched interesting, new features to further...

When the Going Gets Tough, the Tough Gather Online

Tech shows; we all know them, love them, and wish we could get to them. Unfortunately, that's not always possible. Or is...

Flipkart, Amazon Hurtle To Secure Their Slice in Aditya Birla Fashion

The battle conch for the festive season has already been blown. Now in a bid to take control of a new frontier,...

Jio Pages: The Indian Browser Reliance Is Betting On Now!

Looks like Reliance wants to establish Jio as a synonym of technology. After launching a fleet of Jio products in the last...

In-Depth: Dprime

Will ‘TikTok By Microsoft’ Be A Winner?

For the last two years, TikTok has been in the public eye for all sorts of reasons. First, it was the exploded...

Facebook Subscription Model: Looking Beyond Ad Dollars?

Seldom do job listings create a stir this gripping. However, when the job listing in question is a stealth post from Twitter,...

Will The Online Food Delivery Market in India End Up Becoming A Two-Horse Race?

It's pretty much evident that the food delivery space in India is all set to get riled up soon enough as one...

More Articles Like This