War of the Wearable Tech: Microsoft Band vs. the Apple Watch

Must Read

All smartwatches occupy a grey area of technology. It isnít always clear when a smartwatch is a watch, a fitness tracker or something more akin to a smartphone. It is what has necessitated the need for terms like wearable devices. Whatever the correct terminology, Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) recently released the Microsoft Band; it’s contender in the smartwatch market.

Microsoft has recently undergone a huge transformation in a bid to reinvent the brand visually. Arguably a latecomer to the game, the Microsoft Band has spent three years in development. Built to compliment the cloud-based platform Microsoft Health, the Microsoft Band is a comprehensive health database designed to go beyond simply counting your footsteps to potentially warning users about their risk of developing cancer and other diseases.

Microsoft Band vs Apple Watch

So what is the Microsoft Band? The Microsoft Band does look like a fitness tracker, and definitely performs many of the same functions. Even the name “Band removes this product from being labelled a watch if only to stall comparisons between the Apple Watch. But it also performs a whole host of other features that make it worthy of measuring it against the Apple Watch.

Advertisements

Firstly, letís talk about the price. The Apple Watch costs anywhere between $549 and $1,099. By contrast, the Microsoft Band costs a fixed $199. This price difference is representative of the broader trend between Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Microsoft products. Does the difference in price represent a difference in their physical quality? Itís too early to tell.

So what are you getting for your money? There ís no denying that the Microsoft Band isn’t going to be the latest fashion statement. It has been described as only a smartwatch only a mother could love. The thick black rubber strap is not the most tactile material for the wrist and is even vaguely reminiscent of a prison tag. By contrast, the Apple Watch is a bona fide luxury wristwatch and looks every inch the part. Beyond this, the Apple Watch is also highly customizable, leaving the aesthetic of the Microsoft Band severely lacking.

The Band has limited smartwatch functionalities, which Microsoft claims it will add to in the future, but it does perform the essential features that users rely on. Notifications, reading emails, and replying to texts with pre-defined answers are all a part of the Band’s makeup, as is receiving calls. But the app-based experience isn’t as heavy as it is in the Apple Watch, or even other Android smartwatches, which may disappoint owners.

However it’s the details of the Band, such as the optical heart rate sensor, 3-axis accelerometer, gyrometer, GPS, ambient light sensor, skin temperature sensor, UV sensor, capacitive sensor, and galvanic skin response sensor that put it not just ahead of the Apple Watch, but also its competitors in the fitness market. Plus it works with pretty much any mobile device, including iOS devices, which could make it a much more reasonable investment than an Apple Watch.

By contrast, the Apple Watch is somewhat lacking in the fitness department despite a lengthy campaign featuring model Christy Turlington Burns, promoting the watch as the perfect fitness accessory. The retina screen is, however, better equipped to display a whole host of entertainment apps that perform a variety of fun and informative functions that are more centered on user enjoyment and convenience than personal health.

Advertisements

That said, in spite of the ongoing debate amongst sellers of haute horology like Chrono24 as to whether smartwatches are disruptive technologies, there is limited functionality to any smartwatch. The Apple Watch can do amazing things if you have the patience for such a small screen. Plus, a steady finger and a focused eye also come with a steep learning curve. By contrast, the Microsoft Band is more self-assured as a fitness device with the essential smartphone compatibilities.

In conclusion, the Microsoft Band definitely weighs up against its Apple counterpart. Although itís not beautiful, it’s definitely a robust and practical piece of equipment that serves its purpose – something the Apple Watch is struggling to prove. Unfortunately, the quality of the Band is unlikely to challenge the Apple Watch – though few smartwatches can. But, considering the world was watching their every move in the months building up, that shouldn’t come as much of a surprise.

5 COMMENTS

  1. Actually, this is a fair article. A few comments that the author makes (such as highlighted by Jeffrey Whitledge’s comments) shows a slight bias in the article. I use the MS band as I am looking for function over fashion. I also do not want to be tied to one OS and the Band crosses IOS, Android, and Windows. I do agree that the Apple Watch looks pretty sweet though. One thing I wish the author mentioned was battery life. My band lasts 2 days easy which is great.

  2. “Arguably a latecomer to the game, the Microsoft Band…”

    Microsoft Band was available six months before the Apple Watch. (October 30, 2014 vs. April 24, 2015)

    “Even the name “Band removes this product from being labelled a watch if only to stall comparisons between[sic] the Apple Watch.”

    Microsoft Band was available six months before the Apple Watch. The world does not revolve around Apple.

  3. I happen to think that the Apple watch is quite ridiculous looking. An iPod Nano with a watch band. The MS band also isn’t high tech looking at all. It just looks like a fitness tracker. The HP/Michael Bastian smart watch, now that’s a nice watch.

  4. I’ve been using a Microsoft Band since this last Christmas, and love it! The only issue I’ve had with it is a bit of skin irritation on my inner wrist, where I wear the display. But I understand that a few fitness trackers share this issue. It’s great for running, great for weight training, and even has a built in keyboard for short messages that is surprisingly functional. When my Band dies, I’ll certainly be replacing it with another Band, or hopefully, the Band 2 (don’t know when it will be announced, but I have to imagine it’ll be soon).

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest News

The Advantages of Java Logging

If you're a fan of Java logging, you already know that there are three main types, Log4j,...

Jio Postpaid Plus Plan Offers Free Netflix And Amazon Prime To Give Airtel and Vi Run For Their Money?

The just launched Jio Postpaid Plus plan is making heads turned. Just when you think Mukesh Ambani led...

TikTok Oracle Deal: China is Not Happy

Beijing is not at all happy with how the TikTok-Oracle deal panned out! In an editorial, Global Times, the...

TikTok Oracle Deal: Confusion, Contradictions and Quest for Control

Another day Another verbal volley. TikTok Oracle deal saga continues. The tug-of-war with the back and forth statements surrounding...

5 Common IT Infrastructure Management Issues You Must Resolve Today!

Your IT infrastructure supports your entire operation, but there are many struggles departments have difficulty identifying and overcoming. One of the biggest...

TikTok Oracle Deal: No Technology Transfer, No Ownership, Rest All Is Fine

The brouhaha around TikTok and the US administration simply refuses to subside. In the ensuing see-saw of developments, ByteDance...

In-Depth: Dprime

Will ‘TikTok By Microsoft’ Be A Winner?

For the last two years, TikTok has been in the public eye for all sorts of reasons. First, it was the exploded...

Facebook Subscription Model: Looking Beyond Ad Dollars?

Seldom do job listings create a stir this gripping. However, when the job listing in question is a stealth post from Twitter,...

Will The Online Food Delivery Market in India End Up Becoming A Two-Horse Race?

It's pretty much evident that the food delivery space in India is all set to get riled up soon enough as one...

More Articles Like This