Google Gets A Googly For Prioritizing Its Own Products In Search Results

Must Read

Can CBD Gummies Be Beneficial For College Students?

College students often feel more pressure than they have ever—or will ever—feel in their entire lives. Many...

Will Google’s Move To Delete 2,500 YouTube Channels Add Fuel To The Fire With China?

The US-China trade war has started rearing its ugly head. Both sides are now turning to extreme...

India Enterprise IT Spending To Reach Rs. 1,910 Billion In 2012: Manufacturing And communication Industry To Drive The Growth

Manufacturing and Communication Industry is expected to drive the overall growth in the years to come. Sectors like Education,...

Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOGL) finds itself in a very uncomfortable position in the EU. There are serious charges being contemplated by the EU against the search major. The root cause for this outrage and the long list of “objections” being expressed is the fact that the search results shown by Google seem to “preferentially” place Google’s own products and services on top and competitors are relegated after them.

The VOX feels that, at face value, this looks minor, but if we were to study the deep impact and possible implications are far-fetching and may potentially result in a radical change in the way Google works. The current issue seems to be centered around online shopping. Activists and competitors are claiming that Google shopping gets preferential positioning on top when you search for anything. Although that seems to be true and the competitors are justified, there are other factors that we need to consider here. The main issue is that Google doesn’t just put Google shopping on top of the search. It systematically does it for its other products like Google Images, Google Maps, and Google News — by putting them up in neat little boxes near the top of Google search results.

Hence, it should logically follow that if you take the logic of the EC’s complaint, then EU regulators are just scratching the surface of the issue. If it’s illegal to elevate Google Shopping over other search results, it should also be illegal to give preferential treatment or positioning to Google’s other specialized search products for maps, news, or images.

Advertisements

This aspect of interpretation is what Google’s more ambitious critics are pushing for. If they get the final say, it could mean that we will see a drastic transformation of Google’s search product — one that may not be in the interests of customers – us!

For the customer, the average Joe who searches using Google, the problem is more fundamental: getting regulators involved in designing search results could potentially result in “tainted google results” as the whole logic will get overhauled and will be seen as counter-innovative. Google’s practice of including results from its other products in search results pages might be bad for competitors, but it’s definitely convenient for many users like you and me.

The European Commission clearly says that “Google systematically positions and prominently displays its comparison shopping service in its general search results pages, irrespective of its merits,” and that this has been happening since 2008. This is similar to what American and European regulators said against Microsoft in previous decades.

All of us remember the legendary legal tussles that Microsoft faced at its peak for bundling IE and it’s own media player with Windows that potentially killed competition and basically promoted their wares to a HUGE customer base that Windows commanded. Eventually, they lost the battle and were forced to unbundle their stuff from windows. While the media went gaga over the verdict, the number of unbundled copies sold was a minor fraction of the bundled ones and even that roll-out was delayed by a year. So it is not like Microsoft was hurt badly!

So why is the EC looking only at shopping in this seemingly deeper issue, while mostly ignoring the bigger issue involving other Google products? Mark Patterson, a legal scholar at Fordham University, believes European regulators probably focused on shopping because they “have what they think is a smoking gun” — though Patterson says we don’t yet know what that is. It would follow that, if the EC has data as evidence that Google chose to promote its own shopping products and the EU internal data showed customers leaned towards results from third parties, then that could be a justifiable and feasible basis for legal action.

Advertisements

Another seemingly important reason for the focus on shopping is the fact that a European shopping site, Foundem, has been a leading reason for EU officials to take action against Google. Google has removed Foundem from their search results and after a long battle of 9 years, they were restored. Foundem has since then been at the helm of the Anti-Goole lobby in Europe.

Technically, it is possible to enforce a regulation and make Google display competitors’ results in place of Google’s own results. But from an end users’ perspective, the increased bureaucracy could deter Google from making beneficial improvements to its search results page altogether.

There are questions about Net Neutrality that also become relevant here, isn’t what Google is doing in violation of neutrality norms? Aren’t they trying to influence end users into going to their products or sites by default? From that aspect, it looks like a violation, but then as users we are used to this behavior by Google search, so what is right here? If we go by written words, it is wrong.

In summary, what Google is doing is clearly wrong and has to be changed. Complications like Neutrality and the broader implications outside the domain of shopping make this legal tussle very relevant and important. Whatever the outcome, it will definitely change the way we search the web and consume search results. We need to track this development closely as it affects all of us in some way or the other.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest News

OYO Introduces New Initiatives to Increase Employee Satisfaction

With work from home having become the new norm for most Indian startups due to mandatory social...

Amid Acquisition Talks, TikTok Gearing Up For A Legal Battle!

Desperate times call for extreme measures. The popular short-form video app TikTok has been facing unprecedented amounts of backlash from Uncle Sam...

PAN-Aadhaar link: 32.71 Crore Indians Can Now Reap the Benefits

The agenda to link every citizen's Aadhaar card with their PAN card has been on the Indian Government's radar ever since 2017....

When A City Had To Pay Ransom To Cyber Criminals!

While the rapid advancement in technology surely did gift us with newer and more powerful devices, be it smartphones or iPads, it...

Can Twitter’s New Feature Really Make You Feel Safe?

Twitter has been on what seems like a campaign to make the site a place for more meaningful conversations among users. Ever...

TikTok Acquisition: Not A Cake Walk for Microsoft

After President Trump announced an order banning US companies' transactions with Chinese businesses, which is set to come into effect 45 days...

In-Depth: Dprime

Will ‘TikTok By Microsoft’ Be A Winner?

For the last two years, TikTok has been in the public eye for all sorts of reasons. First, it was the exploded...

Facebook Subscription Model: Looking Beyond Ad Dollars?

Seldom do job listings create a stir this gripping. However, when the job listing in question is a stealth post from Twitter,...

Will The Online Food Delivery Market in India End Up Becoming A Two-Horse Race?

It's pretty much evident that the food delivery space in India is all set to get riled up soon enough as one...

More Articles Like This