Samsung Misleading Galaxy Phone Users? Sued For Water Resistant Claims!

Must Read

Free Netflix in India: A Result of Slow Growth In Q3 2020?

Netflix is testing a new strategy that could lead to free Netflix in India. The online streaming...

Apple iPhone 12: Not For India And You Must Not Fall Prey To Apple’s Marketing Machine

The cat is out from the bag, finally! Apple iPhone 12 has launched in the most sophisticated...

Reliance Jio Set To Blitz The 5G Smartphone Market With Jaw-Dropping Price

Cometh the revolution, cometh Reliance. This time the price of 5G smartphones under the radar of Reliance.

Samsung once again finds itself in hot water as the company is accused of misleading potential customers of Galaxy devices. The Korean smartphone giant has got sued in Federal Court for making a false water-resistant claim in their advertisements.

Australia Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has recently filed a case against Samsung Electronics Australia for creating an artifice amongst its consumers. The chairman of ACCC, has accused Samsung of making false claims in order to sell their Galaxy series smartphones in the country.

“Their claim that the phone can be used in any type of water is absolutely inexact”, says the Chairman. 

ACCC has cited Galaxy S10e, S10, S10 Plus, S9, S9 Plus, S8, S8 Plus, S7, S7 Edge, Note 9, Note 8, Note 7, A8, A7, and A5 in its lawsuit.

Advertisements

Galaxy Phone: Truly Water Resistant?

For a long time, Samsung has been advertising the water-resistant capabilities of Galaxy devices. The brand has been promoting its Galaxy devices on a large scale highlighting the water-resistant feature. Even in their advertisements, they showed the phone being used in swimming pools. 

The company has claimed that the Galaxy phones are water-resistant up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes. However, it turned out that the feature is only double-dealing and not true at all.

ACCC says that Samsung cannot justify this water-resistant claim for so many reasons; Samsung did not clearly specify which type of water the phone was advertised for. Now they are saying that the claim was only for fresh water, which is not true. 

One of Samsung’s deceptive ads cited by the ACCC

Moreover, many customers were denied warranty after they complained about the damage caused by water in their phone. ACCC cross-checked about 300 Samsung advertisements before taking any action. They did their research before filing the case. 

The IP68 water resistance, claimed by Samsung in Galaxy devices, does not cover seawater or swimming pool water. Hence, the consumers faced issues with water on their phone. Samsung highlighted this water-resistant feature to shift the consumer base from other big tech players, like, Apple. Or we can say they at least gave it a shot and were successful to a certain extent. 

Advertisements

Furthermore, the price range of these phones was higher than the non-water resistant phones. It was both an emotional and financial loss to the customers. Looks like Samsung is taking its massive consumer base for granted now. 

Samsung is being blamed for not doing extensive testing before advertising about the said feature of their mobile phones.

The company’s own website is advising people to not use the Galaxy S10 on a beach or a pool. However, this did not prevent the brand from advertising mobile phones near oceans, beaches or pools. This has created ambiguity amongst customers who are spending a handsome amount for buying so-called water-resistant galaxy devices.

If Samsung is found guilty, it might face a huge fine and lose some of its customer bases. Let’s hope the incident won’t turn out to be similar to Note 7 and Galaxy Fold debacle.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest News

Can Facebook Be Trusted For Newly Announced Hosting and Shopping Services?

Every coin has two sides. For Facebook Inc. (NASDAQ:FB), the positive side says that it has launched...

When the Going Gets Tough, the Tough Gather Online

Tech shows; we all know them, love them, and wish we could get to them. Unfortunately, that's not always possible. Or is...

Flipkart, Amazon Hurtle To Secure Their Slice in Aditya Birla Fashion

The battle conch for the festive season has already been blown. Now in a bid to take control of a new frontier,...

Jio Pages: The Indian Browser Reliance Is Betting On Now!

Looks like Reliance wants to establish Jio as a synonym of technology. After launching a fleet of Jio products in the last...

Less Than 5% Internet Users In India Have Netflix Subscription

The third-quarter earnings report of Netflix is out; The streaming giant beats the Wall Street expectations in terms of revenue but fell...

Free Netflix in India: A Result of Slow Growth In Q3 2020?

Netflix is testing a new strategy that could lead to free Netflix in India. The online streaming giant is exploring options to...

In-Depth: Dprime

Will ‘TikTok By Microsoft’ Be A Winner?

For the last two years, TikTok has been in the public eye for all sorts of reasons. First, it was the exploded...

Facebook Subscription Model: Looking Beyond Ad Dollars?

Seldom do job listings create a stir this gripping. However, when the job listing in question is a stealth post from Twitter,...

Will The Online Food Delivery Market in India End Up Becoming A Two-Horse Race?

It's pretty much evident that the food delivery space in India is all set to get riled up soon enough as one...

More Articles Like This